The world’s most famous blue man, Paul Karason, also dubbed Papa Smurf, was born as a fair-skinned, freckled boy with ginger hair. In the 2000s, he became an internet sensation and made many TV appearances, openly talking about his condition. Let’s find out together why Karason turned blue and how he became a cautionary tale.
Paul Karason had a skin condition that made his skin flake, as well as acid reflux and arthritis. Doing his own research in order to improve these ailments, he found out about a solution of silver in water, also known as colloidal silver.
Colloidal silver was widely used as an antibiotic back before penicillin was invented in the 1930s. It was banned in 1999 in over-the-counter medications after scientists found that it can severely damage internal organs.
The late Paul Karason and his wife, Joanne
Karason drank what he believed was a miracle cure for over 10 years. Moreover, he even began to apply a silver preparation directly to his skin; he claimed his acid reflux and arthritis just went away. “I had arthritis in my shoulders so bad I couldn’t pull a T-shirt off. And the next thing I knew, it was just gone,” he shared.
Due to the silver accumulation in his skin, he started to turn blue and suffered from a permanent and rare condition called argyria. Only when Karason met an old friend who asked him, “What have you done to yourself?” did he begin to realize he’d become blue.
Karason claimed his blue skin had many advantages — he never got sunburns or had to wear sunglasses. There were some side effects he did not appreciate, however, such as folks “being less than polite” to him. Moreover, Karason confessed he couldn’t get a job because of employers’ resistance to hiring “people that are blue or that are noticeably different.”
Sadly, Paul Karason passed away in 2013 when he was 62 years old due to heart complications.
Papa Smurf’s story serves as a valuable lesson about the importance of being careful when it comes to at-home remedies. While it’s natural to want to find easy solutions to health problems, it’s important to be aware that such remedies can sometimes pose serious risks. It’s always better to consult a doctor and follow their advice for a safe and effective treatment.
Kevin Costner, the famous Hollywood actor and director, is currently facing a Iawsuit
Kevin Costner, the famous Hollywood actor and director, is currently facing a Iawsuit from his neighbor over a view.
The lawsuit alleges that Costner’s property obstructs the neighbor’s scenic view of the Pacific Ocean. The dispute has drawn attention due to the high-profile nature of the parties invoIved, as well as the potential implications for property rights and zoning laws.
Costner is no stranger to lawsuits as reported by The Hollywood Reporter:
The lawsuit was filed by Rick Grimm, a retired professor, who owns a property adjacent to Costner’s estate in Carpinteria, California. Grimm claims that Costner’s constru ction of a berm and the planting of trees have obstructed his view of the ocean.
Grimm alleges that the berm and trees were intentionally placed by Costner to block his view, and that the construction vioIates local zoning laws. Kevin Costner’s representatives have denied the allegations, stating that the berm and trees were installed for erosion controI and that they do not significantly impact Grimm’s view. They also argue that Grimm’s claim is baseless, as he does not own the right to an unobstructed view. The dispute has yet to be resolved, and both parties are expected to present their arguments in court.
The lawsuit raises severaI questions about property rights and zoning laws. While homeowners generally have the right to enjoy their property as they see fit, there are limits to what they can do with their land. Zoning laws, which vary by location, regulate the use and development of land in a given area. These laws are designed to promote public safety, preserve natural resources, and maintain the character of a neighborhood.
In this case, Grimm argues that Costner’s construction vioIates zoning laws, as it obstructs his view and alters the character of the neighborhood. Costner’s representatives counter that the construction is within the bounds of the law and does not significantly impact Grimm’s view.
The outcome of the lawsuit could have significant implications for property owners and zoning laws. If Grimm prevails, it could establish a precedent that home owners must consider their neighbors’ views when making aIterations to their property.
This could make it more difficult for home owners to make changes to their homes or land, particularly in areas with strict zoning laws.
On the other hand, if Costner prevaiIs, it could reinforce the principle that property owners have the right to enjoy their land as they see fit, within the bounds of the law. This could make it easier for homeowners to make changes to their property without fear of legal repercussions, although they may still need to comply with zoning regulations.
The Iawsuit between Kevin Costner and his neighbor over a view raises important questions about property rights and zoning laws. While the outcome is uncertain, the case highlights the importance of considering the impact of property alterations on neighbors and the surrounding community.
Leave a Reply