Over the 71-year history of Miss Universe, this marks the very first participation of a plus-sized contestant. The 22-year-old Miss Nepal has etched her name in history by confidently showcasing her stunning physique. While many people rallied behind her, praising her beauty, a significant portion of the global audience also levied criticism. She candidly addressed these comments, shedding light on her experiences.
She glowed with confidence.
Moises Castillo/Associated Press/East News
Jane Dipika Garrett expressed her pleasant surprise at the extent of her progress in the competition that took place in November 2023. Having harbored dreams of becoming a model, she confronted past struggles with low self-esteem. The overwhelmingly positive response she received during the competition served as a validating experience, and solidified her newfound confidence in embracing her own identity.
© international_poll / Instagram
Garrett noted that she “did not expect to get that much applause on the stage.” She went on to explain that she “wasn’t expecting anything” and was only participating to represent her country and “to represent women all over the world.”
Opinions were divided.
Despite being praised by many around the world for her gorgeous looks, the 22-year-old said that she had also faced harsh criticism from many people. She admitted that some incoming messages were less than positive, reaching the point of being described as “cruel.”
Jane revealed, “I see things like, ’Oh, she’s a whale,’ or ’Why don’t you go to the gym?’ And things like that.” She continued, “It’s like they don’t even know my story. They don’t even know what I’m going through.”
She’s not letting her struggles stop her dreams.
© Miss Universe / YouTube, MARVIN RECINOS/AFP/East News
The beauty contestant clarified that she grapples with a condition known as polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). This medical condition involves the overproduction of androgens by the ovaries, surpassing the typical levels found in women. PCOS manifests with various effects, including weight gain, menstrual irregularities, acne, and excess hair growth.
© Miss Universe / YouTube, © Miss Universe / YouTube
She noted that recently she had gained a lot of weight due to her condition, stating, ’’that’s also really taken a toll on my mental health and my self-esteem because I thought that I wasn’t good enough or that I wasn’t beautiful enough.’’
Nevertheless, Garrett underwent a journey of cultivating a positive mindset and finding comfort in her own skin. Observing her radiant confidence on stage, it’s evident that she has successfully achieved this self-acceptance journey.
We concur that Miss Nepal looks absolutely stunning, and we consider it a significant stride for the Miss Universe competition to embrace and celebrate the beauty and diversity of women’s bodies in all shapes and sizes. To delve further into the realm of Miss Universe and discover how previous winners are looking today, we invite you to explore this article.
Kevin Costner, the famous Hollywood actor and director, is currently facing a Iawsuit
Kevin Costner, the famous Hollywood actor and director, is currently facing a Iawsuit from his neighbor over a view.
The lawsuit alleges that Costner’s property obstructs the neighbor’s scenic view of the Pacific Ocean. The dispute has drawn attention due to the high-profile nature of the parties invoIved, as well as the potential implications for property rights and zoning laws.
Costner is no stranger to lawsuits as reported by The Hollywood Reporter:
The lawsuit was filed by Rick Grimm, a retired professor, who owns a property adjacent to Costner’s estate in Carpinteria, California. Grimm claims that Costner’s constru ction of a berm and the planting of trees have obstructed his view of the ocean.
Grimm alleges that the berm and trees were intentionally placed by Costner to block his view, and that the construction vioIates local zoning laws. Kevin Costner’s representatives have denied the allegations, stating that the berm and trees were installed for erosion controI and that they do not significantly impact Grimm’s view. They also argue that Grimm’s claim is baseless, as he does not own the right to an unobstructed view. The dispute has yet to be resolved, and both parties are expected to present their arguments in court.
The lawsuit raises severaI questions about property rights and zoning laws. While homeowners generally have the right to enjoy their property as they see fit, there are limits to what they can do with their land. Zoning laws, which vary by location, regulate the use and development of land in a given area. These laws are designed to promote public safety, preserve natural resources, and maintain the character of a neighborhood.
In this case, Grimm argues that Costner’s construction vioIates zoning laws, as it obstructs his view and alters the character of the neighborhood. Costner’s representatives counter that the construction is within the bounds of the law and does not significantly impact Grimm’s view.
The outcome of the lawsuit could have significant implications for property owners and zoning laws. If Grimm prevails, it could establish a precedent that home owners must consider their neighbors’ views when making aIterations to their property.
This could make it more difficult for home owners to make changes to their homes or land, particularly in areas with strict zoning laws.
On the other hand, if Costner prevaiIs, it could reinforce the principle that property owners have the right to enjoy their land as they see fit, within the bounds of the law. This could make it easier for homeowners to make changes to their property without fear of legal repercussions, although they may still need to comply with zoning regulations.
The Iawsuit between Kevin Costner and his neighbor over a view raises important questions about property rights and zoning laws. While the outcome is uncertain, the case highlights the importance of considering the impact of property alterations on neighbors and the surrounding community.
Leave a Reply